Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 81 - 100 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2006, 12:04 pm
Notable blogosphere chatter about the Supreme Court's decision in Belmontes (basics here) includes posts from Orin Kerr, Karl Keys and  Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 4:51 am
  Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences has this notable reaction: "There is substantial reason to believe that moratoriums kill innocent people. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 12:00 pm by Paul Cassell
As Kent Scheidegger points out in this detailed post, the action was not intended to be a statement by the ALI that the death penalty should be abolished. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on the Court’s disclosure of “after-the-fact changes to its decisions”; Kent Scheidegger discusses Liptak’s story and the Court’s publication practices more generally at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:02 am by CJLF Staff
Yesterday, CJLF's Legal Director Kent Scheidegger was on the Diane Rehm Show from WAMU in Washington, along with Joan Biskupic of USA Today and Amy Fettig of the ACLU, discussing Monday's Plata decision. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:40 am by Kent Scheidegger
"The way they do things now is preposterously long," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the conservative Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston explained the state of play for this blog; other coverage comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:18 am
  Kent Scheidegger here at Crime & Consequences points to this Criminal Justice Legal Foundation press release explaining why he is hoping for a decision that will "prevent the retroactive application of Blakely. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:30 pm
  Via Grits for Breakfast, Kent Scheidegger's post at Crime and Consequences is such an apocalyptic vision that it will make your hair stand on end. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:06 am by CJLF Staff
Federal Judicial Appointments:  While partisan battles swirl around the President's nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, as noted by Kent Scheidegger in a recent post, appointments to federal district courts and courts of appeal are also of great importance. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on this week’s summary reversal of the Sixth Circuit in the habeas case White v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by CJLF Staff
CJLF's legal director, Kent Scheidegger, was a recent guest on KFI's "The John and Ken Show" discussing the death penalty. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:40 am
The following entry is by Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:56 pm by The Federalist Society
 Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:44 am by Federalist Society
 Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:56 pm by The Federalist Society
 Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, Pete Williams and the Associated Press at NBC News, and Erik Eckholm of The New York Times, while Kent Scheidegger has commentary on the ruling for Crime and Consequences. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:00 pm by CJLF Staff
Debating was Death Penalty Focus Executive Director Jeanne Woodford and Criminal Justice Legal Foundation Legal Director Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am by Marissa Miller
Circuit – has joined the administration in urging the Court to take up this case; at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Noel Canning’s request and examines the additional question presented that Noel Canning has proposed. [read post]