Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 81 - 100 of 602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2018, 9:01 am by Andrew Hamm
” With commentary at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger disputes Erwin Chemerinsky’s inclusion (in an article for the ABA Journal) of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule among the areas in which Justice Anthony Kennedy “was the fifth vote for a liberal result, and where it is uncertain, or even unlikely, that Kavanaugh would decide the same way. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:54 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to Rory Little’s post for this blog on Kavanaugh’s record in criminal cases. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger maintains that “[t]he present political scandal is no reason at all to leave the Supreme Court short-handed. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers a chart comparing “the number of days from nomination to the commencement of hearings for the last four Justices nominated by Democratic Party Presidents and the scheduled date for Judge Kavanaugh. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the court yesterday sent a case back to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to determine whether a military statute of limitations barred a 2014 prosecution for a rape that occurred in 2005. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Kent Scheidegger on Crime & Consequences looks at the consequence of replacing Kennedy in criminal cases; he does “not expect that the Kennedy-Whomever succession will come close on the Richter Scale to the Marshall-Thomas succession on matters of criminal law. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on another summary reversal in a habeas case. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Kent Scheidegger discusses the ruling at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
Early commentary comes from Scott Lemieux of Lawyers, Guns & Money; Orin Kerr of The Volokh Conspiracy; Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences; Louise Matsakis of Wired; Barry Friedman for The New York Times; Aziz Huq for Vox; and Sabrina McCubbin for Lawfare. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on Rosales-Mireles and Chavez-Meza. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks on the lack of criminal law action in Monday’s Supreme Court opinions and orders. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Kent Scheidegger looks at yesterday’s sentencing decisions, along with a cert denial in a capital case, at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that in Royal v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses McCoy and today’s other criminal-law opinions. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:35 am by CJLF Staff
  Participating in the program were Harvard Law Professor Carol Steiker and CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the Supreme Court has adopted this year’s set of amendments to the federal rules of procedure. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks that “[t]he defense side ‘won’ [this] case, but it may be a Pyrrhic victory,” and that “[h]ow the decision is applied in practice, as always, remains to be seen. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Kent Scheidegger comments on the case at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:33 am by SHG
Crime & Consequences, to see what sort of lunacy Bill and his partner in crime, Kent Scheidegger, had cooking. [read post]