Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 101 - 120 of 613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2016, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, Pete Williams and the Associated Press at NBC News, and Erik Eckholm of The New York Times, while Kent Scheidegger has commentary on the ruling for Crime and Consequences. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am by Marissa Miller
Circuit – has joined the administration in urging the Court to take up this case; at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Noel Canning’s request and examines the additional question presented that Noel Canning has proposed. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Over at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has an interesting post on the Supreme Court’s recent qualified immunity decision, Reichle v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:47 am by
But in endorsing Kent Scheidegger on National Opt-Out Day, I think we've got one. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
  I covered the order for this blog, while Kent Scheidegger discusses the grant at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on yesterday’s execution of an Ohio death-row inmate, carried out after the Supreme Court denied the inmate’s petition for a stay, in which the inmate had challenged the state’s lethal-injection protocol; he argues that “[w]e spend far too much in time and resources litigating issues that have nothing to do with guilt,” and that “[w]here the underlying offense is one for which death… [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Daniel Fisher of Forbes, with commentary from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
  The following entry is by Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
Kent Scheidegger says he hasn't yet decided for sure.Although I very much doubt that his mental defense will be sufficiently compelling to make the death penalty not the appropriate sentence, I would still want to see it before deciding. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:37 pm
I can only imaging what Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences will think about today's en banc ruling from the Ninth Circuit in Pinholster v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
  Excitingly, Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation has now focused attention on this issue through this new working paper, titled "The Death Penalty and Plea Bargaining to Life Sentences. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:07 am by CJLF Staff
According to the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation's Kent Scheidegger, the answer to why Texas has the most executions is "(1) size, and (2) not being obstructed by hostile courts." [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
  Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to my Plain English preview of Elonis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
At Crime and Consequences Blog, Kent Scheidegger recaps a recent Michigan Law Review essay on the DNA testimony at issue in McDaniel v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:43 am by Will Baude
Kent Scheidegger was another contributor, and described himself as “holding up one side versus four others,” but I’m not sure our legal analyses weren’t that different. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:05 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by CJLF Staff
    The arguments made in the amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs filed by CJLF (Kent Scheidegger) and the comments in support of crime victims, law enforcement, and the death penalty, as presented by CJLF (Kent Scheidegger or Mr. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who observes that if “the defendant is sentenced to death, as people who commit horrible crimes frequently are and should be, the capital appeal defense cult stands ready to say that the trial lawyer was incompetent for taking the path that he did at each fork in the road, regardless of which one he took. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
”  Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences with a detailed analysis of what the ruling might mean for other inmates on the state’s death row. [read post]