Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 161 - 180
of 622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 6:13 am
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Court’s denial of relief to a Georgia death row inmate, who was executed on Friday; only Justice Stephen Breyer dissented from the Court’s order. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:13 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reacts to the latter editorial, expressing surprise that “we would read the words ‘Donald Trump is right’ in a New York Times editorial about anything, but especially about one of the Left’s favorite jurists. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:36 am
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
Coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, with commentary from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences (who also weighs in on the ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Ronald Mann for this blog and David Savage of Los Angeles Times, while at Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger looks at the “interesting and potentially relevant aspects” of yesterday’s cases. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
Arizona comes from Kent Scheidegger, who at Crime and Consequences offers “a simple proposal for a modernization of Miranda”; and from Samuel Gross and Maurice Possley, who at The Marshall Project suggest that electronic recording of interrogations “should be universal. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Commentary on yesterday’s grants comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Johnson v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 6:51 pm
Kent Scheidegger has this post at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
Chatman, holding by a vote of seven to one that the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision that the defendant failed to show purposeful race discrimination in the selection of his jury was clearly erroneous, comes from Tony Mauro of Supreme Court Brief (subscription or registration required); commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Janell Ross for The Washington Post, Steven Mazie in The Economist, and Garrett Epps in The Atlantic. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am
Commentary comes from Dara Lind and Dylan Matthews at Vox, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, and Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the controversy over the naming of George Mason’s law school for Scalia. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am
” Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences with a detailed analysis of what the ruling might mean for other inmates on the state’s death row. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:04 pm
Early coverage comes from Barbara Leonard at Courthouse News Service, and early commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences Blog, who also addresses Monday’s decision in Welch v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:24 am
To discuss the case, we have Kent S. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Woods v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Coverage comes from Daniel Fisher of Forbes, with commentary from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who discusses the timing for a successor at PrawfsBlawg; from Kent Scheidegger, who criticizes the record of Judge Jane Kelly in capital cases at Crime and Consequences; and in an op-ed for USA Today, where Eric Wang argues that, although we “may not know for sure exactly what Scalia would have thought about the merits of the arguments now being made about who should appoint his successor,” “we do know what he would have… [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on Wearry v. [read post]
