Search for: "Kern v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Kern (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 814, and my 3/3/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:04 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Louie Gohmert (TX-1), Tyler Bowyer, Nancy Cottle, Jake Hoffman, Anthony Kern, James R. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
*The Appellate Division opined that "petitioner was accorded his full right to explain his conduct," and that he was not entitled to a hearing, citing Matter of Shraeder v Kern, 287 N.Y. 13. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
*The Appellate Division opined that "petitioner was accorded his full right to explain his conduct," and that he was not entitled to a hearing, citing Matter of Shraeder v Kern, 287 N.Y. 13. [read post]