Search for: "Kern v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm
In S.M.C. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 10:00 pm
M.P. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In dismissing the counterclaim on summary judgment, Judge Kern held that defendants had failed to state a claim. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In dismissing the counterclaim on summary judgment, Judge Kern held that defendants had failed to state a claim. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:33 am
Kern, Augustine, Conroy & Schoppmann, 2012 NY Slip Op. 31988(U), Justice Madden is a current example. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:13 pm
On the practical difficulties of bringing as applied challenges under Crawford, see Julien Kern, As-Applied Constitutional Challenges, Class Actions, and Other Strategies: Potential Solutions to Challenging Voter Identification Laws After Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The case is Scott v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The case is Scott v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
The majority on the panel cited Kern v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
" Similarly, in Bailey v Kern, 177 Misc 904, the Court said that it did not have the power to command an appointing authority to fill a vacancy because the discretion to make appointments is vested in the appointing authority. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:24 am
Kern, 122 N.J. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
