Search for: "Kern v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 10:23 pm
§ 4058(a)(1); County of Kern v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:23 pm
§ 4058(a)(1); County of Kern v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
Common Law Disclosure Requirements A 1963 decision by a California appellate court, Lingsch v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
Common Law Disclosure Requirements A 1963 decision by a California appellate court, Lingsch v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:20 am
Summary of the Facts of the Case of Luis Garcia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:33 am
The motorcyclist was pronounced dead at Kern Medical Center about a half hour after the crash. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:40 am
Additional Resources: Judge Awards $1.4 Million in Dog-Bite Case, Aug. 19, 2016, By Christian Nolan, The Connecticut Law Tribune More Blog Entries: Carter v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm
In S.M.C. v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
In the United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm
Also filing and letters in support of the opinion remaining published were the California State Association of Counties, California Building Industry Association, Building Industry Association of the Bay Area, Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation, the County of Kern, a private developer (Cross Development, LLC) represented by Remy Moose Manley, and the law firm of Downey Brand LLP. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
During the hearings Caspian produced reports stating that the variances would not impact the neighborhood. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
During the hearings Caspian produced reports stating that the variances would not impact the neighborhood. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
Supreme Court in Carlesi v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
Largely denying motions to dismiss filed by a school district and three employees, who allegedly accessed their administrative assistant’s private email after she accused them of wrongdoing in order to get information supporting their recommendation that she be fired, a federal court in Oklahoma found that she plausibly alleged violations of her First and Fourth Amendment rights, state privacy laws, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and more (Murphy v Spring,… [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
