Search for: "Kern v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Superior Court Kern County (1980) 27 Cal.3d 690. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Garcia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Citing Walsh Bishop Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
(Schofield v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:10 pm
Image via WikipediaIn World Publishing Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Decided and Entered: June 28, 2022 Before: Gische, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Singh, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Decided and Entered: June 28, 2022 Before: Gische, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Singh, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
And Peter Margulies examined the nominee’s misplacement of his characteristic empathy in Kerns v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 10:28 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Adel Yazidi v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:33 pm
United States (09-837): originally conference of 5.20.10 United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:09 am
State of California (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Brownstein, Town of Greece v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
On these facts the cross-reference to Kern was too general, and the anticipation attack failed (neither document alone contained a clear and unambiguous disclosure). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
Now, not only was the attempt at an opt-in class class reversed (Kern v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
Kern v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In dismissing the counterclaim on summary judgment, Judge Kern held that defendants had failed to state a claim. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In dismissing the counterclaim on summary judgment, Judge Kern held that defendants had failed to state a claim. [read post]