Search for: "Kerr v. United States District Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:56 am
The seminal case in this area is United States v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:45 am
When Jim Tyre sent me the decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
”), and State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
The city claims that there are over a hundred “similar” ordinances or statutes across the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Kerr 14-460Issue: (1) Whether, after this Court's decision in New York v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Klayman thinks not, and tells the court that the United States only moments ago admitted to doing the very things that Klayman has alleged. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
The defendants in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Consider in that regard the Supreme Court’s Rule 19, which not only provides wholly different procedures for cases in which a question has been certified by a Court of Appeals, but also stresses that “When a question is certified by a United States court of appeals, this Court, on its own motion or that of a party, may consider and decide the entire matter in controversy. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
More Nonsense on Differential Diagnosis The Supreme Court recently addressed differential etiology in Matrixx Initiatives, in stunningly irrelevant and errant dicta: “We note that courts frequently permit expert testimony on causation based on evidence other than statistical significance. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
United States. [read post]
