Search for: "Kerr v. United States District Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 2:52 pm
§ 2510(9) as: (a) a judge of a United States district court or a United States court of appeals; and (b) a judge of any court of general criminal jurisdiction of a State who is authorized by a statute of that State to enter orders authorizing interceptions of wire, oral, or electronic communications; That definition tells you what judges can issue wiretap orders — for example, Article III… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
Karo and United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:26 am
United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939).If you think about it, this was a rather ridiculous rule. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
There, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, applying Florida law, concluded that a limitation of liability clause that precluded recovery of “direct, special, incidental or consequential damages resulting from any breach of warranty or condition, or under any other legal theory,” was unenforceable. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:32 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:09 pm
Bank of the United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
As Wikipedia explains, “The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
(Carlo Allegri/Reuters) From today’s United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
Forbes previews United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
United States, says that the Fifth Amendment doesn’t block complying with a court order when the testimonial part of complying with a court order is a foregone conclusion. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
United States, 425 U.S. at 394–95, 96 S. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
Before United States v. [read post]
