Search for: "Kerr v. United States District Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Klayman thinks not, and tells the court that the United States only moments ago admitted to doing the very things that Klayman has alleged. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
The defendants in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:25 am
Back in August, the Third Circuit handed down an unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
§ 17C-15-18(a)(1); State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:55 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Consider in that regard the Supreme Court’s Rule 19, which not only provides wholly different procedures for cases in which a question has been certified by a Court of Appeals, but also stresses that “When a question is certified by a United States court of appeals, this Court, on its own motion or that of a party, may consider and decide the entire matter in controversy. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 2:52 pm
§ 2510(9) as: (a) a judge of a United States district court or a United States court of appeals; and (b) a judge of any court of general criminal jurisdiction of a State who is authorized by a statute of that State to enter orders authorizing interceptions of wire, oral, or electronic communications; That definition tells you what judges can issue wiretap orders — for example, Article III… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversing the district court and granting a conditional preliminary injunction is vacated. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
ConsiderUnited States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:47 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
More Nonsense on Differential Diagnosis The Supreme Court recently addressed differential etiology in Matrixx Initiatives, in stunningly irrelevant and errant dicta: “We note that courts frequently permit expert testimony on causation based on evidence other than statistical significance. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
I’ve been thinking more about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:43 pm
United States, the exclusionary rule does not apply if the conduct was permitted by “binding appellate precedent. [read post]
