Search for: "Key v State" Results 1 - 20 of 21,803
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am by Ivan Horodyskyy
This position was supported by several key arguments, including: The Russian Federation is engaged in aggression against Ukraine, severely breaching its state sovereignty with the intention of committing genocide, in direct opposition to the principles and objectives of the U.N. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
But this argument ignores a key requirement: lawful countermeasures must be, as far as possible, reversible in their effects. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While I point to other problems with Palmer, I explain why it is a key source for rejecting the status quo ante baseline. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am by Orin S. Kerr
  In just the last few months, for example, opionions include People by James v. [read post]
This piece deals with the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), addresses key concerns about the risk of unenforceability of PMAC arbitral awards, and proposes three implementable solutions. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Evan Brown
(One has to consider whether these would pass First Amendment scrutiny, particularly in light of recent decisions such as the one in NetChoice v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
IP may have centred on rights of individuals, but its ownership and teaching is likely to become ever more collaborative and collective.The editors state the need for sharing best practice as a key driver for this book. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]