Search for: "Key v State"
Results 81 - 100
of 22,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2024, 3:48 pm
Utah State Legislature (h/t Ballot Access News). [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 10:51 am
Supreme Court decided in Bush v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
To the extent Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court already removed one such guardrail in Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:14 pm
[An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"] Regular readers may recall my prior coverage of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 2:11 pm
Other States’ Decisions: No Standing to Challenge the Rule Conversely, a federal court in Arkansas determined in States of Tennessee, Arkansas et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm
Project applicants can use TMUD credits alongside other various local, state and federal credits and incentives to attain financing necessary to complete their projects. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
The opinion noted that no state has enacted a ban as broad as the one proposed by the FTC, and the FTC failed to justify its sweeping approach or consider less disruptive alternatives. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:58 am
Supreme Court vacated a DC Circuit ruling in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblower case Lissack v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:59 am
The case before the Court, Snyder v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:58 am
The resolution of this case leaves open a key question about Section 230. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:33 am
Over the years, Chevron‘s scope has been shaped through cases like United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am
The Judge re-stated the need to make allowance for editorial judgment, citing the principles summarised in Banks-v-Cadwalladr [2022] 1 WLR 5236. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Palkon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 1:52 pm
I am concerned that shrinking Subchapter V eligibility will lead to more businesses either failing in regular Chapter 11 cases or forgoing bankruptcy altogether and simply handing their lenders the keys to their collateral. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Regulation platforms build solidarity among States. [read post]
