Search for: "Key v. SSA" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am by Kristine Knaplund
On March 19, the Court will hear oral argument in Astrue v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm by Jean Braucher
The Arizona Supreme Court currently has under review a mortgage documentation case, Vasquez v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(D.I. 59, Ex. 6 at§ 6.E) Specifically, the Special Servicing Agreement required that the Trusts provide written notice to the rating agencies,[4] and receive written confirmation from the rating agencies, that the proposed appointment would not result in a reduction or withdrawal of the Notes' then-current ratings (the "SSA Rating Agency Condition"). [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Neither the DRA legislation nor CMS' July 27, 2006 communication to state Medicaid directors references structured settlements. von Saucken identified and explained key DRA issues for structured settlements whether paid directly to personal injury claimants and their spouses or indirectly through a special needs trust. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
However, he pointed out that the difference in formal standards—misleading v. materially misleading—was not the key; a marketer debating whether its communications are only misleading or materially misleading is already in a bad place. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:09 pm by fvanloon
” However, we found that SSA 1 was selected to provide the FBI briefings, in part, because Flynn, who was a subject in the ongoing Crossfire Hurricane investigation, would be attending the Trump campaign briefing. [read post]