Search for: "Keyston v. Keyston" Results 1 - 20 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 6:03 am by Simon Lester
At first glance, I would say that this measure likely constitutes an export restriction under GATT Article XI:1, and may also violate GATT Article V (freedom of transit). [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
Watch the Supreme Court website for the opinion ruling -- Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Thompson v Heineman Turns out Keystone’s backers lost 4-3, but state law required a super majority…. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:35 am by Matthew Campbell
Here are the briefs on the United States’ and TransCanada’s Motions to Dismiss Rosebud and Fort Belknap’s treaty and jurisdiction claims regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Kate Fort
The Court enjoins Federal Defendants and TransCanada from engaging in any activity in furtherance of the construction or operation of Keystone and associated facilities until the Department has completed a supplement to the 2014 SEIS that complies with the requirements of NEPA and the APA. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 4:44 am by Charles Sartain
The farmers relied upon the 2012 Texas Supreme Court decision Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:32 am
Crawford had two arguments: first, that the Texas statutes granting pipelines condemnation authority do not apply to interstate pipelines; and second, that Keystone had failed to meet the showing required by the Texas Supreme Court in Texas Riceland Partners v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:24 am by John McFarland
Because of the Texas Supreme Court's recent opinion in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by WIMS
<> Nebraska Supreme Court Issues Decision In Keystone XL Case - Decision for Thompson v. [read post]