Search for: "Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp."
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 2:32 pm
Together with his wife, Kim brought this strict products liability suit against defendant Toyota Motor Corporation and related entities (collectively, “Toyota”), claiming that the pickup truck was defective because its standard configuration did not include a particular safety feature, known as vehicle stability control (“VSC”), they claim would have prevented the accident. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:29 pm
Somewhere between these two competing principles.Or, in the words of Justice Segal:"The Kims challenge the trial court’s denial of their motion in limine to exclude evidence that the custom of the automotive industry was not to include ESC [Electronic Stability Control] as standard equipment in pickup trucks. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:04 am
Toyota Motor Corp., Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:17 am
However, in Kim v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
’: Tribunal Practice Notice 6/2009 Requirement to attend hearings in relations to applications for invalidation where there are grounds of invalidation under sections 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and/or 5(4) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (IPKat) Why automotive engineers don’t end up as patent infringers – Ian Hartwell reports findings of survey of UK and German engineering companies (IPKat) Web Sheriff takes on Jamie Oliver for dressing like member of The Village People without permission… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
bit.ly/yXQj8B (Philip Gordon) News Corp. [read post]
