Search for: "Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Marvel Entertainment, LLC (2015) rejuvenates a 50-year-old rule that limits collecting patent royalties after a patent expires. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:06 am
Supreme Court, in revisiting the issue in the case of Kimble v Marvel Entertainment, LLC (as reported by AmeriKat on June 30th), would provide some clarity. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
Marvel Entertainment, LLC (2015); and Commil USA,... [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
Marvel Entertainment, LLC, decided June 21, 2015).Bazinga! [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:45 am by Michael Baniak
Marvel Entertainment, LLC, just handed down June 22, 2015, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the 50 year old holding  of  Brulotte v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:51 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Por otro lado, Marvel Entertainment, LLC (en adelante Marvel) manufactura y vende productos relacionados al personaje de ficción Hombre Araña. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:55 am by Jason Rantanen
Marvel Entertainment, LLC (2015) Download Opinion Opinion by Justice Kagan. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:59 pm
Marvel Entertainment, LLC: Royalty Payments After Term Patent ExpirationCHAPTER 3. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Kimble v Marvel Entertainment: when post-expiry patent royalties meet stare decisisThe unsatisfying U.S. [read post]