Search for: "Kimbrough v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007), with the United States Sentencing Commission’s Guideline ranges for drug trafficking violations, as did the Honorable John Gleeson, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-1260Issues: (1) Whether the discretion recognized under Kimbrough v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:19 pm by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Last week, the Sixth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
Here is the question it presents: "Whether, when determining the 'reasonableness' of a district court sentence under United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:40 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice'Booker,' 'Kimbrough,' Amendment 706 Preclude Reduced Sentence for Crack Cocaine's DistributorUnited States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm by James Bickford
United States, the Court wrestled with the question of whether convictions for offenses involving coca paste should be subject to the same mandatory minimum sentence as those involving crack.  [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 5:45 am
The latest broadside fired at the guideline edifice comes in a great dissent by Judge Noonan in United States v. [read post]