Search for: "King v. Ackerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Bruce Ackerman advised aspiring constitutional theorists of my generation to learn German. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
(See generally, Jeff King and Octavio L.M. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
It is worth noting that Bruce Ackerman's important rendering of the the New Deal as a "constitutional moment" amending the Constitution outside Article V in effect requires ignoring, or at least diminishing the relevance, of McCulloch. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
In his dissent in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Ackerman, Ackerman & Dynkowski I. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am
The underlying action is pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 13874/13. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
Ackerman, 2014 WL 2968164 [D Kan. 20140; United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
On September 30, 2009, the plaintiff filed DD v SK and MR, in Supreme Court, Kings County, bearing Index Number 24694/2009. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:30 am
We the People, Vol. 3: The Civil Rights RevolutionBruce Ackerman (2014, Belknap Press) Ackerman, a professor of law and political science at Yale University, focuses on the events and laws that shaped the civil rights era and helped to end Jim Crow, starting with the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Despite all the violence that marked the civil rights revolution, the methods championed by , together with the sweeping political victories of racial liberalism in the Martin Luther King's adaptation of Gandhi-like methods, together with the decisive and bipartisan electoral victories of the 1960s, gained a bipartisan "mandate from the People" for landmark statutes and judicial super-precedents that went far beyond the more formal principles of racial… [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
”(Ackerman & Fishkin, Deliberation Day, p. 6, quoting from Delli Carpini & Keeter’s comprehensive survey.) [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
King. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
King. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
King and Robert F. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
From the Press:The Civil Rights Revolution carries Bruce Ackerman’s sweeping reinterpretation of constitutional history into the era beginning with Brown v. [read post]
