Search for: "King v. Burwell"
Results 321 - 340
of 710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 9:27 am
States are preparing for the worst if the Supreme Court rules this month in King v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
ASARCO, holding that Section 330(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not allow courts to award attorney’s fees for fee applications, might portend for the Court’s eventual decision in King v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
President Obama’s recent remarks about King v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:51 pm
This puzzle's important, and not just for King v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
The case, King v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
Is this an indication of the likely result in King v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
” The Economist’s Democracy in America Blog features a trio of posts on King v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 11:16 pm
The following post is by Mila Sohoni. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:48 pm
Health Insurance Subsidies (King v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
It’s part of the reason why the challengers in King v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
Commentary on the Court’s upcoming decision in King v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 1:51 am
by Fran Quigley, guest contributor I have a thick stack of detailed notes and a Power Point presentation, all prepared for use in teaching about the implications of the King v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
As a law student and constitutional law scholar, I am surprised that the Supreme Court opted to take King on appeal. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
Burwell at a news conference Monday. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
” Other coverage of and commentary on the Court anticipate the Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:49 am
Mila Sohoni (San Diego) has a thoughtful new essay at the Yale Journal on Regulation Online about the Supreme Court's forthcoming decision on Obamacare. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:32 am
A day earlier in Europe, President Obama had more pointed remarks for the Supreme Court and its acceptance of the King v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:37 am
However, whether these subsidies continue for those on the federal exchange will turn on how the Supreme Court rules in King v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
” At the Maddow Blog, Steve Benen cites an exchange at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Affordable Care Act as evidence to argue that, as “much of the political world wait for the Supreme Court to issue its ruling in the King v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 1:14 pm
(Kevin Lamarque/Reuters) During Monday’s news conference after the G-7 summit, in addition to commenting on King v. [read post]
