Search for: "King v. Burwell" Results 521 - 540 of 720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
Next week the Court will hear oral arguments in the most highly anticipated case of the sitting:  King v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
Burwell may prove a Pyrrhic one. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the Court’s upcoming decision in King v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
At casetext, James Blumstein analyzes the Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:28 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Filed under: 4980D, 4980H, 6039D, ACA, Affordable Care Act, board of directors, Cafeteria Plans, Claims Administration, Consumer Protection, Contraception, Corporate Compliance, directors, EBSA, employee, Employee Benefits, Employer, Employers, Employment, Employment Tax, ERISA, Excepted Benefits, exchange, Excise Tax, Excise Taxes, Fair Labor Standards Act, fiduciary duty, Fiduciary Responsibility, health benefit, Health Benefits, health Care, health insurance, health insurance marketplace, health… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Wexler of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s Workplace Class Action Blog 8 Questions For Doing Business in China – Washington, DC attorney Meena Harris of Covington & Burling on the firm’s blog, InsidePrivacy Unpaid Internships Given New Life by the Second Circuit – Cleveland lawyer Todd Leibowitz of BakerHostetler on the firm’s Workplace Class Action Blog The Impact of King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:41 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Saikin of BakerHostetler on the firm’s blog, Health Law Update Corporate Espionage: Not Your Typical Sports-“Gate” – Boston attorney Erik Weibust of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets Millions Can Keep Health Coverage Because of the Supreme Court’s Decision in King v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:16 am
Under Chevron, the agency’s interpretation might be due some deference, but not under King v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The controversy has already reached the Justices in the case of King v. [read post]