Search for: "King v. Burwell" Results 41 - 60 of 819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In his dissent from denial of cert earlier this year in Silvester v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 3:30 am by Edward Rubin
In any case, Supreme Court decisions tend to be so politically charged that they frequently seem sui generis, a characteristic that provided the Court itself, in King v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am by Peter Margulies
That common sense proposition is key to Supreme Court decisions such as King v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While Congress continues to debate the future of the Obamacare health reforms and its exchanges, the Department of Health & Human Services is reminding employers with less than 50 employees that wish to offer group health coverage for their employees to check out their coverage options offered the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace established as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:28 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Filed under: 4980D, 4980H, 6039D, ACA, Affordable Care Act, board of directors, Cafeteria Plans, Claims Administration, Consumer Protection, Contraception, Corporate Compliance, directors, EBSA, employee, Employee Benefits, Employer, Employers, Employment, Employment Tax, ERISA, Excepted Benefits, exchange, Excise Tax, Excise Taxes, Fair Labor Standards Act, fiduciary duty, Fiduciary Responsibility, health benefit, Health Benefits, health Care, health insurance, health insurance marketplace, health… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:42 am by Lawrence Solum
Although we agree that the Court provided little guidance about the doctrine’s scope in King v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
Dorsen: I made that arrangement with the firm Wallace King, which Sedgwick absorbed as its Washington office. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]