Search for: "King v. Burwell" Results 141 - 160 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
Burwell, but nothing to sniff at, either. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:00 pm
According to the dissenting opinion, "The majority relies almost wholly on King v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 2:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Burwell 1:30-3:15Incorporating Medical Legal Partnerships into Your Law School's Triple Aim; Education, Research, and Community Engagement [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Solutions Law Press, Inc. is happy to share information about this upcoming free health industry study group meeting on 9/15/2015 in Irving, Texas. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:16 am
Under Chevron, the agency’s interpretation might be due some deference, but not under King v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
  He concludes that it’s “[n]ot likely” but adds that “few expected the court to hear the frivolous semantic complaint known as King v Burwell last year. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) today (August 11, 2015) jointly released updated information about how the Departments plan to develop rules to implement the data reporting rules needed to implement the transparency provisions of section 1311(e)(3) of the Affordable Care Act with respect to non-Exchange coverage, including health insurance issuers offering group and individual health insurance coverage (non-QHP… [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Challengers may take comfort in the Supreme Court’s ruling in King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and other sponsors of non-grandfathered group health plans, their insurers, administrators and fiduciaries should adjust the co-payment, deductible and out of pocket limits applicable for the 2015 plan year to reflect the recent adjustment in the out-of-pocket limits on essential benefits allowed by that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Burwell might mean for” other upcoming challenges. [read post]