Search for: "King v. Burwell" Results 161 - 180 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Businesses that did not file required retirement plan returns should contact legal counsel about whether  they can come into compliance and avoid painful penalties by taking advantage of a newly announced Internal Revenue Service (IRS)  low-cost penalty relief program  for IRS penalties and a Department of Labor (DOL) voluntary compliance resolution program for Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) penalties. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers sponsoring group health plan coverage now or in 2014, check the adequacy of your insurer or third party administrator’s claims and appeals processes and notices. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
As Adam White noted in a SCOTUSblog post  after King v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 11:36 am by Mark Giangrande
Burwell), allowing the use of certain drugs in carrying out the death penalty (Glossip v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:59 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 The GOP won the midterm elections, and the Court granted certiorari in King v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
” The American Bar Association recently hosted a teleforum on the Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:27 am by Amy Howe
Burwell and Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and ensure the internet data sharing and other applications and portals… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:30 pm by Old Fox
Folks out in the free enterprise world cannot do that — thank God.But just as we saw the shares of three healthcare companies skyrocket after the recent SCOTUS decision in King v Burwell — government should not be able to mandate to individual citizens that they MUST purchase a private sector commodity — inconsistent with the Commerce Clause — but very beneficial to the business that the government has chosen to coddle. [read post]