Search for: "King v. Central Bank" Results 1 - 20 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
The case, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:36 am
Tosca KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Defendants Fail to Show Good Cause For Delay in Post-Note of Issue Motion Tucci v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Amy Howe
The Justices also heard arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:13 am
Reed NASSAU COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawLandlord Did Not Obtain Central Relief Sought; Not Prevailing Party, Not Entitled to Attorney's Fees Clinton Realty LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The merits of that challenge are not the issue in this column, but I have to say that I find the central claim in King to be extraordinarily weak. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCreditors' and Debtors' RightsArgentine Central Bank Funds Used to Repay IMF Debt Cannot Be Attached by Holders of Defaulted Bonds EM Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm by Alain Leibman
Duncan, 919 F.2d 981, 986 (5th Cir. 1990) (hospital records compiled by insurance companies are business records of those companies), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 926 (1991); In re King Enterprises, Inc., 678 F.2d 73, 77 (8th Cir. 1982) (invoices received from suppliers become business records of receiving entity); Matter of Ollag Construction Equipment Corp., 665 F.2d 43, 46 (2nd Cir. 1981) (financial statements supplied to bank are business records of bank); United States… [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LANDICINO, JJ.2023-05014(Index No. 58551/22)[*1]Chappaqua Congress of Teachers, et al., appellants,vBoard of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., respondents.Robert T. [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LANDICINO, JJ.2023-05014(Index No. 58551/22)[*1]Chappaqua Congress of Teachers, et al., appellants,vBoard of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., respondents.Robert T. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Morgan Chase Bank, NA., 31 Misc 3d 1237(A) [Sup Ct, Kings County 2011] [“admissions made by plaintiffs in the 2009 action and the bankruptcy court action refute an essential element of their claim in the present action, that the named and intended payee, Prestige, did not receive the funds … “]). [read post]