Search for: "King v. Cornell" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The ruling is a clear victory for Donald Trump and his vision of the President as King. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:02 am by Bridget Crawford
Among the new members are these academics: CaliforniaColleen V. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Berman, The King James Bible at 400: Scripture, Statecraft, and the American Founding, (The History Channel Magazine, pp. 1-11, November 2010).John M. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Lachanda Reid and Gabriela Markolovic have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Center. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Emma Horne and Nicole Jaeckel preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
We talked about some of the many battles this interaction has birthed, from massive resistance against Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was scheduled to hear argument later this month in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in questioning Judge Jackson last week, Texas Senator John Cornyn repeatedly referred to the right to same-sex marriage, which the Supreme Court recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Over the last few years, I have puzzled over the refusal of some people to refer to trans men as men and trans women as women. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Both developments are visible in the landmark case King v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
The lone Bruen cite to professor Cornell's private source was simply part of a refutation of an argument made by professor Cornell and the dissent. [read post]