Search for: "King v. Palmer" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Palmer, 202 NY 483, 493, 96 N.E. 99 [1911]; see also, Rachmani Corp. v. 9 East 96th Street Apartment Corp., 211 AD2d 262, 266, 629 NYS2d 382, 384 [1st Dep't 1995] ). [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:51 am by Colin E. Flora
[The king himself should not be subject to man, but to God and the law, for the law makes the king. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Spencer L. Reames
 This rule has its genesis in the Court of Appeals decision of Riggs v Palmer, in which the Court stated “[n]o one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or to take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime” (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506, 511 [1889]). [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am by Adam Chandler
For a second day, media outlets are flush with analysis of Monday’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am by Smita Ghosh
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:04 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
This serves to further differentiate this particular line of cases from those considered to be more egregious (see e.g., Riggs v Palmer, supra). [read post]