Search for: "King v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Oyelowo doesn’t physically resemble the civil rights leader, nor does his voice possess quite the ringing timbre most people associate with one of the greatest orators of the 20th century. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am
In King v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 10:17 pm
King. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
On March 5, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Marcella King Piazza v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In King v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:35 pm
Much ink has been spilled over what Republicans must do if the Supreme Court decides, in the upcoming case of King v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:28 pm
The case, Whyte Monkee Productions v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
Friday’s welcome-but-unexpected grant in King v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:19 am
"Writes Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker about the King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
Dolan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
In People v King a two to one panel of the Court of Appeals narrowly defined what a locked enclosure was in a manufacturing of marijuana case. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:43 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In 2009, a Ninth Circuit panel held (in Nordyke v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm
Prior posts on King v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:26 pm
Iran v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:15 am
King. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:12 am
The Court distinguished People v Fiumefreddo (82 NY2d 536 [1993]) because, unlike Fiumefreddo, here the specific terms of this plea were not subject to extended discussion nor did defendant have sufficient time to consider the alternatives to taking it. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
King. 1. [read post]