Search for: "King v. Portland"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2022, 9:03 am
I discussed State of Maine v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
See State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm
In the weeks and months following the nationwide protests against police violence, we continued to work closely with our fellow Electronic Frontier Alliance members, local ACLU chapters, and other dedicated organizers to support new bans on government face surveillance across the United States, including in Boston, MA, Portland, OR, Minneapolis, MN, and Kings County, WA. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana Marion… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
Legal Context To the Framers of the Constitution, the king’s appointment power was “the most insidious and powerful weapon of eighteenth century despotism,” one that the king used to appoint “‘miniature infinitesimal Deities’” to spread the “weeds of tyranny” across the colonies. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
See, e.g., Portland Sch. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
I was just rereading the briefs and arguments in the landmark Myers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 8:29 am
Ambrosetti v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:24 pm
Rice v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:28 am
In Passananti v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Collin & National Socialist Party v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:54 am
City of Portland (D. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Lee v. [read post]
