Search for: "King v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 2,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
  CITIZENS UNITED, ELANA KAGAN, AND THE QUESTION THAT HAD NO PLAUSIBLE ANSWERMost liberals and progressives view Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/503(b)(3)(emphasis mine) There is literally zero case law in the United States about how to specifically divide a carried interest in a divorce action. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
 The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
You can reach her by e-mail at reva.siegel@yale.edu.Mary Ziegler is Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta handed down judgement in the case of Peterson v McNallie 2024 ABKB 127. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
In the British system, "all the king's subjects" could be impeached, including private citizens. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]