Search for: "Kirby v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2016, 2:39 pm
On the other hand, the facts of this case bear some important similarities to those in Kirby v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:39 pm
On the other hand, the facts of this case bear some important similarities to those in Kirby v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:18 pm
The starting point to defining a “professional service” is found in the principle expounded by Justice Kirby in GIO[12] which states that these are ‘‘services of a skilful character according to an established discipline”[13]. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm
In Kirby v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:04 pm
In Kirby et al v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:28 pm
North Carolina Supreme Court Decision On June 10, 2016, in the case of Kirby v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:59 am
On June 10, 2016, the Supreme Court of North Carolina, in Kirby, et al., v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:51 am
Throughout my years with the IGDA I contributed to numerous IGDA White Papers including: • Publisher Contract Walkthrough v.1 - 2003 • Publisher Contract Walkthrough v.2 - 2003 • Intellectual Property Rights White Paper - 2003 • Quality of Life White Paper - 2004 • Publisher Contract Walkthrough v.3 - 2006 • King.com - Position Statement on Trademarks (Editor)- 2015 • DMCA IP Enforcement White Paper (Editor) - 2016 I was elected to my… [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am
” At Notice and Comment, Michael Kagan has “initial reactions” to the federal government’s opening brief in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:02 am
State, 710 So.2d 116 (2d DCA 1998), Kirby v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:31 pm
In a recent decision by the Fifth District Appellate Court (Kirby v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 9:36 pm
Kirby v County of Fresno, 2015 WL 7765893 (CA App. 12/1/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Medical Marijuana [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:46 pm
Members shadowed local humane officers as they responded to animal cruelty calls and attended oral arguments for Carol Grunewald v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
Clements, 2012 SCC 32 (CanLII), [2012] 2 S.C.R. 181, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed the primary “but for” test of causation and aptly summarized the present state of the law as follows … See Kirby v Raman, 2015 NLCA 48 (CanLII) What I have omitted from para. 101 of the quotation above is paragraphs [8-11] of Clements. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Metaphysics: Toney v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Scarduzio states that ‘[h]umor was employed by many of the 12 judges … observed’ in two United States municipal courts. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 2:50 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:50 am
") AC34862 - State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 2:05 pm
In Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:44 am
The name of the case is Kirby v. [read post]
