Search for: "Kirkland v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm
Kirkland, the SDHR had asserted a claim that certain provisions of the Town of Oyster Bay zoning ordinance discriminated against minorities in violation of the State Human Rights Law. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm
On June 18, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Williams v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:58 am
Coverage of last week’s grants in Sebelius v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:05 am
In Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:17 am
Facts: This case (Robinson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:22 pm
In Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:55 am
Unsurprisingly, DirecTV filed its petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc on August 9th, seeking rehearing of the Cappuccitti v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 1:08 pm
EDT, the National Conference of State Legislatures will host a webinar examining two cases from the 2020 term with significant implications for elections, Brnovich v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
United States (06-6911), and as amicus supporting petitioners in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:38 am
Also, some pretext.The case is Kirkland v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:00 am
In Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
” ACSblog’s series of posts on Harris v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:40 am
Briefly: Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses last week’s order granting Senator Mitch McConnell’s motion to share in the argument time in NLRB v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:14 am
The Wall Street Journal reports that Jay Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis, who successfully argued that federal law requires preemption of state failure-to-warn claims for generic drugs, given the lack of discretion that such generics have, in Pliva v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
District Court, judges are free to guess what they think the California Supreme Court would decide.** When interpreting state law, federal courts are bound by decisions of the state's highest court (In re Kirkland (9th Cir.1990) 915 F.2d 1236, 1238), but in the absence of such a decision, a federal court shall apply the rule that it believes the state supreme court would adopt if faced with the same issue. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:48 am
District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco must still approve the settlement in the lawsuit, known as Ahmed v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Kirkland v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Lefkowitz is a senior litigation partner at Kirkland & Ellis, LLP. [read post]
