Search for: "Kirkland v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am by James Bickford
Thompson and last week’s oral argument in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:29 am
In March, the high court struck down pre-emption involving drugs in a major case, Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP in Los Angeles will argue for the petitioners. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It need not be followed, for example, when an agency's action is challenged as either unconstitutional or wholly beyond its grant of power, or when resort to an administrative remedy would be futile or when its pursuit would cause irreparable injury" citing see Town of Oyster Bay v Kirkland, 81 AD3d 812. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It need not be followed, for example, when an agency's action is challenged as either unconstitutional or wholly beyond its grant of power, or when resort to an administrative remedy would be futile or when its pursuit would cause irreparable injury" citing see Town of Oyster Bay v Kirkland, 81 AD3d 812. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm by Marcia Coyle
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
  Prof That same panel is hearing two other IP cases: Samsung v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]