Search for: "Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013), and is likely to reappear and influence the Court in a patent case in which it has recently granted certiorari, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013), and is likely to reappear and influence the Court in a patent case in which it has recently granted certiorari, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the common law doctrine barring restraints on alienation, which serves as the basis for patent exhaustion, makes no geographical distinctions— that an authorized sale of a patented article outside the U.S. exhausts the U.S. patent rights in that article. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:41 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:12 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
The petitioner in Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:43 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. that the common law doctrine barring restraints on alienation that is the basis of exhaustion doctrine “makes no geographical distinctions,” a sale of a patented article – authorized by the U.S. patentee – that takes place outside of the United States exhausts the U.S. patent rights in that article. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 11:20 am
Academic textbook publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 579 U.S. ___ (2016). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 579 U.S. ___ (2016). [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:19 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
John Wiley & Sons, 568 U.S. ___ (2013) (see Kat report here).This time around, the question presented was whether Kirtsaeng could recover his attorney’s fees (totalling over $2 million) from John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016 WL 205944 (Jan. 15, 2016), which sought determination of the proper standard for attorneys’ fees awards in copyright cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016 WL 205944 (Jan. 15, 2016), which sought determination of the proper standard for attorneys’ fees awards in copyright cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
John Wiley & Sons, in which the Court weighed in on the standard for fee-shifting under the Copyright Act, comes from Ronald Mann for this blog. [read post]
