Search for: "Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is interesting. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:25 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court, having reversed the Second Circuit's decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:03 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 15-375. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:39 am
BACKGROUND John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is an academic textbook publisher that sells textbooks both in the United States and abroad. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. that the common-law doctrine barring restraints on alienation that is the basis of exhaustion doctrine “makes no geographical distinctions,” a sale of a patented article – authorized by the U.S. patentee – that takes place outside the United States exhausts the U.S. patent rights in that article. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 6:55 pm
The oral argument this week before the Supreme Court in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. supporting a flexible approach to awarding attorneys’ fees. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
John Wiley & Sons, the Court considered the “first sale” doctrine of copyright law. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
John Wiley & Sons, 568 U.S. ___ (2013) (see Kat report here).This time around, the question presented was whether Kirtsaeng could recover his attorney’s fees (totalling over $2 million) from John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
John Wiley & Sons, is a dispute over copyrighted textbooks produced overseas but imported to the United States and resold by Kirtsaeng without the publisher's permission. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the U.S. [read post]