Search for: "Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the answer to this question is yes. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am by Amy Howe
John Wiley & Sons, in which the Court weighed in on the standard for fee-shifting under the Copyright Act, comes from Ronald Mann for this blog. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
These were books published by John Wiley & Sons’ Asian licensees – they were not counterfeit or pirated. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm by Christine Corcos
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013), and is likely to reappear and influence the Court in a patent case in which it has recently granted certiorari, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013), and is likely to reappear and influence the Court in a patent case in which it has recently granted certiorari, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:17 am by Ben
Customer Tees, Inc., 879 F.Supp. 1200 (N.D. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am by Bruce E. Boyden
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., despite Hurricane Sandy’s imminent arrival and the fact the entire federal government in Washington DC is shut down today. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]