Search for: "Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 5:08 pm
Above the Law and the Yale newspaper. * Google doesn't want to hear your complaints about your reputation management. * Moneygram settles with the FTC (to the tune of $18M) that its money wiring service was used to perpetrate fraud. * The FTC scores a rare COPPA settlement, this time with Iconix for $250,000. * John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
John Wiley & Sons Inc., a case concerning the first sale doctrine in copyright law as it pertains to goods purchased abroad and resold in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc) and demand its return without having to reimburse you for the cost (and then resell it to someone else).Heck, under Disney's argument the very act of scribbling in a book could also result in prosecution under copyright laws. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by Tom Casagrande
But dividing 4-4, it was able only to issue a non-precedential affirmance.Today, a 2-1 majority of the 2d Circuit in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:15 pm by RatnerPrestia
The copyright owner, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is an academic textbook publisher that assigned to its foreign subsidiary (Wiley Asia) the rights to publish, print, and sell Wiley’s English language textbooks outside the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
Last Monday the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued their decision in John Wiley & Sons, Inc v Supap Kirtsaeng which examined the status of the first sale doctrine following Omega v Costco. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am by Conor McEvily
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, in which the Court will consider the legality of purchasing copyrighted works overseas and bringing them back to the U.S. for resale, without the permission of the copyright owner. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am by LTA-Editor
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. implicitly overturns the Federal Circuit precedent Jazz Photo Corp. v. [read post]