Search for: "Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 8:30 am
At JURIST, John Rothchild examines the possible impact of the Court’s recent decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court, having reversed the Second Circuit's decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
These were books published by John Wiley & Sons’ Asian licensees – they were not counterfeit or pirated. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:15 pm
The copyright owner, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is an academic textbook publisher that assigned to its foreign subsidiary (Wiley Asia) the rights to publish, print, and sell Wiley’s English language textbooks outside the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
John Wiley & Sons – U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the answer to this question is yes. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 12:18 pm
John Wiley & Sons ($JW-A), the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:16 am
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. was not a fan of Kirtsaeng’s business. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., I just wanted to offer some brief thoughts. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:28 am
Tuesday, in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
John Wiley & Sons, the Court considered the “first sale” doctrine of copyright law. [read post]
