Search for: "Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
John Wiley & Sons Inc., a case concerning the first sale doctrine in copyright law as it pertains to goods purchased abroad and resold in the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
John Wiley & Son – a case  involving gray market goods and copyright items;  Clapper v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. — right to bring into the U.S. for resale a copyrighted item purchased abroad Tues., Oct. 30: 11-820 — Chaidez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm by admin
The brief comes as a response to a recent decision by the Second Circuit to limit the protections under Section 109 of the Copyright Act to works created within the United States in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am by Cormac Early
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in which the Court will consider whether the first sale doctrine in copyright law applies to works manufactured abroad. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:35 am by Jon Miller
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. owned the copyright on eight of those textbooks. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am by Conor McEvily
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, in which the Court will consider the legality of purchasing copyrighted works overseas and bringing them back to the U.S. for resale, without the permission of the copyright owner. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in which the Justices will consider how two provisions of the federal Copyright Act apply to a copy that was made and legally acquired abroad, but then imported into the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:48 pm by christopher
As set out by Williams Mullen, the Kirstaeng case is an interesting one: “In John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm by Steven
The ruling comes in the case of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]