Search for: "Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc." Results 161 - 178 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(PlagiarismToday)   US Copyright – Decisions 2nd Circuit: First sale doctrine does not apply to foreign-made works – Importer is copyright infringer: John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(PlagiarismToday)   US Copyright – Decisions 2nd Circuit: First sale doctrine does not apply to foreign-made works – Importer is copyright infringer: John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., might suggest that the present group of justices has a strong inclination to protect purchasers; any such inclination would provide further support for the alleged infringer. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 15-375, which concerns the standard for prevailing parties to obtain attorney’s fees under the Copyright Act; Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 1:09 pm by Mary Minow
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S.Ct. 1351 (2013), impact the ability of right holders to offer their works at different prices and different times in different online markets? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm by Ronald Mann
There is a recent case (Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,) in which the justices adopted a broad rule of exhaustion under copyright law, but that case affords little guidance because the Copyright Act, unlike the Patent Act, codifies the exhaustion doctrine. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
The petitioner in Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]