Search for: "Knapp v. Knapp"
Results 21 - 40
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 12:28 pm
For example, in Knapp v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Coyle (University of North Carolina School of Law), The Canons of Construction for Choice-of-Law Clauses On International Arbitration Csongor István Nagy (University of Szeged), Central European Perspectives on Investor-State Arbitration: Practical Experiences and Theoretical Concerns Evangelos Kyveris (University College London), An In-Depth Analysis on the Conflicting Decisions in Dallah v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
But then in Knapp v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
But then in Knapp v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:10 am
Knapp [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:10 am
Knapp [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:23 pm
Speaking to this issue, the Appeals Court of Massachusetts released an opinion in the case of Knapp v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:23 pm
Speaking to this issue, the Appeals Court of Massachusetts released an opinion in the case of Knapp v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:35 am
v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:35 am
v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Harris County v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Harris County v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am
The Knapp Foundation, 64 NY2d 458, 465 [1985]). [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am
The Knapp Foundation, 64 NY2d 458, 465 [1985]). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
In Knapp v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:12 am
The Court ruled 6-2 in Gobeille v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Knapp, dba The Wild Side, v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:26 pm
Dimaya v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:18 pm
Andrew Knapp, counsel for petitioner) (Sejal Zota, counsel for amici) In a published decision written by Judge Stephen Reinhardt, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held yesterday in Dimaya v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Poughkeepsie appealed the Supreme Court’s ruling and the Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s order annulling Knapp’s decision to terminate Peterson.The Appellate Division said that “Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law” and, citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
