Search for: "Kohl v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm by Jeffrey May
” Defendants would be permitted to petition the United States for permission to continue to participate in the JOE. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am by Bexis
  While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
' They're still looking at, ‘Does that equate to an energy efficient unit,' ” Kohl said.EPA in a March 4 letter criticized a permit proposed by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality for PacifiCorp Energy, which plans to add two natural gas-fired generating units to its existing Lake Side Power Plant in Utah County.EPA said the proposed permit would have required PacifiCorp to use “high efficiency” gas turbines with heat… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
The plans, called Medicare Advantage, are run through private health insurers as an alternative to traditional fee-for-service Medicare plans.Medicare Billing Fraud: DRUG SUPPLIER CAN'T BE LIABLE FOR KEEPING OVERPAYMENTS, COURT RULES, United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:26 pm
Cobb, H&R Block’s president and CEO.Further information regarding United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
While the statements in question may have been made in the United States, they were republished in Ontario and were alleged to have caused injury to Lord Black’s reputation in Ontario. [read post]