Search for: "Kopel v. Kopel" Results 61 - 80 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2010, 2:30 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) The ban at the Fort Collins and Pueblo campuses, had been scheduled to take effect on August 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Kopel, adjunct professor of constitutional law, Denver University. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm by Josh Blackman
The title of this post captures a current blogosphere disagreement between Dave Kopel and Doug Berman regarding the interpretation of the Second Amendment in Ezell v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:58 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) Is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act consistent with the original meaning of Constitution? [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by David Kopel and Randy Barnett
Kopel wrote and Barnett  joined an amicus brief filed by Second Amendment professors on behalf of the petitioners in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) The decision from the Northern District of Florida is available here. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:17 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) Students for Concealed Carry on Campus v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:47 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) I’ll be providing them here tonight, once the polls close, and results start coming in. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:19 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) Filed earlier this week by Stephen Halbrook, in the case of Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 10:14 am by Ilya Somin
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kopel: On May 22, 2016 I was proud that Nassau County signed into Law a piece of Legislation that I sponsored, taking a stand against discrimination and bigotry against Israel. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:44 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) A recent Yale Law Journal Online article by Northwestern law professor Andrew Koppelman argues that the Obamacare individual mandate is obviously constitutional, especially in light of how McCulloch v. [read post]