Search for: "Koza v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2013, 7:36 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Recently, the popular website, Investment Treaty Arbitration (www.italaw.com) has published the majority and the dissenting awards on objection to jurisdiction for lack of consent in the case of Garanti Koza v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The basic scheme for allocation of jurisdiction under the Recast Regulation is that persons domiciled in a Member State of the European Union should generally be sued in that Member State (by article 4), but they may also be sued in another member state in certain situations, including in cases of exclusive jurisdiction specified under article 24. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:58 am by CMS
In particular Hassett v South Eastern Health Board (Case C-372/07) [2008] ECR I-7403 and Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe v JP Morgan Bank Chase Bank NA (Case C-144/10) [2011] WLR 2087 show that art 24 is to be construed narrowly and both were considered in the present case. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am by Anthony Fairclough
Akcil & Ors v Koza & Anor, heard 19 Mar 2019. [read post]