Search for: "Kurt Lash"
Results 121 - 140
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
(forthcoming 2025)),Kurt Lash & Stephanie H. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
The participants are Daniel Harawa, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; Aderson Francois, Georgetown Law; Kurt Lash, University of Richmond School of Law; and Gerard Magliocca, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
Magliocca and Kurt Lash at the National Constitution Center on John Bingham and the Fourteenth Amendment.Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:41 am
Returning to the conversation, I'm excited to welcome back Hadar Aviram (Hastings), Sasha Natapoff (LLS), Austen Parrish (SW), Rick Esenberg (Marquette), Colin Miller (JMLS), and Kurt Lash (LLS en route to Illinois). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:19 am
Both Philip Hamburger and Kurt Lash have written on "the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Kurt Lash, The Reconstruction Amendments: The Essential Documents (University of Chicago Press, 2021)(2 vols.). [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:03 am
Here is today’s Court coverage, in brief: At Prawfsblawg, Kurt Lash asks, “Who is ‘the best there ever was’ as an advocate before the Supreme Court? [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:14 pm
Lash In Defense of Bailouts by Adam J. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 12:30 am
The History Roll has a review of Kurt T. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:26 pm
Among the many contributions Kurt Lash’s two-volume set on the Reconstruction Amendments provides to present-day discourse, it supplies the careful reader an answer to this timeless question by highlighting the role of Frederick Douglass in public deliberation over the Fifteenth Amendment. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Kurt Lash and Kermit Roosevelt discuss the Slaughterhouse Cases with Jeffrey Rosen on the National Constitution Center's podcast.The new Editor-in-Chief of the Virginia Law Review has a shout-out to Cynthia Nicoletti for her legal history courses. [read post]
14 May 2017, 10:55 am
Indeed, here's what I told then-law student (now professor) Will Baude in his 2003 20 questions interview with me (itself an homage to your own 20 questions for appellate judges) about why I started blogging: Back in January, I was talking about The Senate's filibuster of judges with my Loyola Law School colleague, Kurt Lash. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:00 am
"This proposed law is a classic example of a government lashing out at political ideas it doesn't like," said Greg Magarian, JD, professor of law in the School of Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:26 pm
Among the many contributions Kurt Lash’s two-volume set on the Reconstruction Amendments provides to present-day discourse, it supplies the careful reader an answer to this timeless question by highlighting the role of Frederick Douglass in public deliberation over the Fifteenth Amendment. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:09 am
Lash In Defense of Bailouts Adam J. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:41 am
Lash, THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF AN OMISSION: THE TENTH AMENDMENT, POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, AND “EXPRESSLY” DELEGATED POWER (article, 2008) Washington Times: Can the Tenth Amendment Save Us? [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:58 am
There is a terrific lineup--with papers by Kurt Lash, Randy Barnett, Jack Balkin, James Fleming, Thomas Lee, Garrett Epps, and me, and comments from John Harrison, Michael Kent Curtis, Thomas Merrill, Keith Whittington, Jack Rakove, Michael Ramsey, and Larry Alexander.Michael Rappaport and Michael Ramsey organized the conference, and I wanted to thank them both for doing such a terrific job! [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:35 am
Loyola Law School Professor Kurt Lash said: ""If this is a unique deal that has not been offered to anybody else and is unlikely to be offered to anybody else, we might have a problem here as a public facility showing preference and getting uniquely involved with a religious group. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In a recent Indiana Law Journal essay that Justice Thomas cites in Bruen, Kurt Lash argues for that approach. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am
Kurt Lash and Mike Rappaport have both quoted the passage from 388, and we need not repeat it. [read post]