Search for: "Lámar v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
The court reached the same conclusion in La Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct, Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016], holding that a marketability discount would have been “inappropriate in this context” because the majority “made clear in their testimony that they did not intend to sell . . . and that no amount of money would tempt them to do so. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
More likely the state will do what elites do everywhere--they ignore these engagements and to the extent possible undermine their authors. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
Crane, did not have to wrestle with the permissive-versus-mandatory question as in Talking Capital for the simple reason that the Nevada LLC statute at play in Human Nature Las Vegas Inc. v Gildea, 2018 NY Slip Op 30507(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 23, 2018], expressly casts a member’s right to bring a derivative action as a default rule (“unless otherwise prohibited by the . . . [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
  Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]