Search for: "L. Richardson & Co., Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
: Simonian v Norvartis Animal Health US, Inc (Docket Report)   US Copyright CCIA study finds fair use industry worth trillions (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) US bill on radio music royalties gets key backing (IP Watch)   US Copyright – Decisions 7th Circuit: $60,000 sanction on attorney for bringing a copyright action: Tillman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Among other criticisms, Richardson states that when officers went to her house to retrieve her vehicle, she did not come to the door. [read post]