Search for: "LANDRIGAN v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 9:34 am by Kent Scheidegger
The State's response quotes this statement from the defense's own mental health expert back in 1990, giving Landrigan's own version of the events. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:05 am
  And Arizona killed Landrigan shortly thereafter. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 2:20 pm by Steve Hall
  More on the  Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:42 pm
On Tuesday, the Court will hear arguments in Schriro v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:02 am
Justices Souter and Scalia seemed to be arguing more with each other than with the attorneys on Tuesday, January 9, when the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Schriro v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:25 am by Howard Bashman
Monitor, Ethan DeWitt has a front page article headlined “At state Supreme Court nomination hearing, MacDonald grilled over Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:43 pm by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:01 am by Amanda Rice
 As Appellate Daily’s Michelle Olsen points out, Landrigan’s name might sound familiar because in 2007 the Court decided his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in another five-to-four decision (Schriro v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Landrigan (05-1575), reversing the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:27 am by Lyle Denniston
  At an earlier stage of Landrigan’s case, when it was in state court, state officials indicated that, because of a shortage of the drug from Hospira, they had obtained it elsewhere. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am by Adam Chandler
Landrigan was executed at 10:26 p.m. (12:26 a.m. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
Guarinin Public Policy Forum and this post on the 40th anniversary of the Loving v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:31 pm
It looks like most states are going to stay executions at least until the Court hands down a ruling in the case in question, Baze v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:01 pm by Kate Howard
Hardwick 15-1379 Issue: (1) Whether the Eleventh Circuit may reject the state court’s findings of fact under Anderson v. [read post]