Search for: "LANGDELL v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Today is the Symposium in Honor of Professor Sherry Colb, hosted by Rutgers School of Law in Newark and co-sponsored by the Cornell Law Review. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:03 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:55 am
Their work burst the myth of legal objectivity by mercilessly exposing the political ideology of Lochner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Their work burst the myth of legal objectivity by mercilessly exposing the political ideology of Lochner v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm
Homer, From Langdell to Lab: The Opportunities and Challenges of Experiential Learning in the First Semester, 48 Mitchell Hamline L. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:13 pm
But the United States is not on better ground. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 10:11 am
The Court ordered the parties in the case, Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
Nor was he a formalist, as is obvious from his criticism of Christopher Columbus Langdell. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:12 pm
” (Deborah Merritt, Ohio State University) “Langdell’s Harvard Law School emerged out of Eliot’s vision for Harvard University, which itself reacted to global social and economic shifts. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:58 am
The GGW “casebook” accordingly integrates the most important Supreme Court opinions with important state court decisions, public criticisms of U.S. and state Supreme Court decisions, and constitutional debates (taking place in varied venues) about territorial acquisition, the constitutionality of a national bank (Alexander Hamilton v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:50 pm
The rule from that case has been adopted into the law across the United States, and it is now the basis for section 351 of the Restatement (2d) of Contracts. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Langdell was a United States resident and the first and second defendant companies were incorporated in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
Cautious Co v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:50 am
Take, for example, the chestnut case of Batsakis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
or Groves v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:39 am
†to “Miss Smith, what was the holding in Terry v. [read post]
