Search for: "LAWRENCE M. SMALL" Results 1 - 20 of 397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The small numbers of actual first exposure events speak loudly for the inconclusiveness and fragility of the study results, and the sensitivity of the results to any methodological deviations or irregularities. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 3:21 am by SHG
According to Brett Stephens, he played the “I’m a Jew” card. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm by Guest Author
   Initially, there was broad agreement from conservative judges, scholars, and advocates – including Kenneth Starr, Lawrence Silberman, and Antonin Scalia – that Chevron represented a salutary neutral principle for judicial review of regulatory decisions. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am by centerforartlaw
Prince incorporated Graham’s photograph in his work Portrait of a Rastajay92, which was exhibited at Gagosian’s Madison Avenue gallery in 2014 and featured on the promotional billboard materials for the Gagosian’s exhibition.[10] Prince sold Portrait of a Rastajay92 to the Gagosian Gallery (the Gallery), and the owner of the gallery, Lawrence Gagosian, later purchased the work from the Gallery.[11] In 2015, Graham sued Prince and the Gallery for copyright infringement… [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Perhaps that's all that Stalin meant, in which case, I'm happy to repudiate it. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
A judge who is prone to fly off the handle at small provocations is not likely to be effective in the courtroom, and hence we ought not to select the hot-tempered for judicial office. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Major Questions and Juristocracy January 31, 2022 | David M. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
Carnright, Interview with Center for Art Law (August 16, 2022) John M. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
“The exercise of the rights at issue in Griswold, Eisenstadt, Lawrence, and Obergefell does not destroy a “po­tential life,” but an abortion has that effect” (slip op. 218) So the reason that the right to abortion can be overruled is that it harms a third party (the fetus). [read post]